Energy
Energy projects move heavy, high-value equipment against fixed commissioning dates, often to remote or offshore sites.
Why this is different
A commissioning date in the energy sector is rarely negotiable — contracts, grid connections and workforce mobilisation are all scheduled against it. That makes the logistics behind it a scheduling problem as much as a transport one: every component has to land in the sequence the site actually needs, not just the sequence it's manufactured in.
Much of this cargo is also heavy, oversized or sensitive to handling — turbine sections, transformers, subsea equipment — which narrows the realistic routing and vessel options before a single booking is made. Getting the plan right early is what keeps a fixed commissioning date achievable rather than aspirational.
What this looks like in practice
How we plan around it
We plan around the commissioning date backwards, sequencing marine, port and inland transport so components arrive in the order the site needs them.
Project LogisticsSee if these match your operation
Construction
Construction programmes depend on materials and plant arriving in a specific sequence, on sites with limited access windows.
Manufacturing
Manufacturers need predictable inbound components and outbound finished goods, with minimal buffer stock tying up capital.
Engineering
Engineering firms move precision components and prototype equipment where damage or delay carries disproportionate cost.
Planning a energy shipment?
Tell us about the constraint that matters most — schedule, sequence, or route — and we'll plan around it.